논문업데이트

Home. 최근뉴스. 논문업데이트

논문업데이트

Treatment with grass allergen peptides improves symptoms of grass poll…

페이지 정보

작성자 관리자
댓글 0건 조회 1,260회 작성일 17-04-13 02:58

본문

Treatment with grass allergen peptides improves symptoms of grass pollen–induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ,online 21 February 2017
Anne K. Ellis, Charles W. Frankish, Robyn E. O'Hehir, Kristen Armstrong, Lisa Steacy, Mark Larché, Roderick P. Hafner,
Abstract
Background
Synthetic peptide immunoregulatory epitopes are a new class of immunotherapy to treat allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). Grass allergen peptides, comprising 7 synthetic T-cell epitopes derived from Cyn d 1, Lol p 5, Dac g 5, Hol l 5, and Phl p 5, is investigated for treatment of grass pollen–induced ARC.
 
Objective
We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intradermally administered grass allergen peptides.
 
Methods
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated 3 regimens of grass allergen peptides versus placebo in patients with grass pollen–induced allergy (18-65 years). After a 4-day baseline challenge to rye grass in the environmental exposure unit (EEU), subjects were randomized to receive grass allergen peptides at 6 nmol at 2-week intervals for a total of 8 doses (8x6Q2W), grass allergen peptides at 12 nmol at 4-week intervals for a total of 4 doses (4x12Q4W), or grass allergen peptides at 12 nmol at 2-week intervals for a total of 8 doses (8x12Q2W) or placebo and treated before the grass pollen season. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score across days 2 to 4 of a 4-day posttreatment challenge (PTC) in the EEU after the grass pollen season. Secondary efficacy end points and safety were also assessed.
 
Results
Two hundred eighty-two subjects were randomized. Significantly greater improvement (reduction of total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score from baseline to PTC) occurred across days 2 to 4 with grass allergen peptide 8x6Q2W versus placebo (−5.4 vs −3.8, respectively; P = .0346). Greater improvement at PTC also occurred for grass allergen peptide 8x6Q2W versus placebo (P = .0403) in patients with more symptomatic ARC. No safety signals were detected.
 
Conclusion
Grass allergen peptide 8x6Q2W significantly improved ARC symptoms after rye grass allergen challenge in an EEU with an acceptable safety profile.
  • 목록

    • 댓글목록

    등록된 댓글이 없습니다.